Ignorance is a
bliss! I was reminded of this phrase this week in a couple of occasions by two
different individuals, when a “socially perceived sensitive” topic was on the
table.
Before I enter into the real point of this writing I must show the next two paragraph as a preamble:
Before I enter into the real point of this writing I must show the next two paragraph as a preamble:
So many
individuals, as I perceive it, take me as a person trying to force my views on
certain topics, without even allow me to show them that that is not the case.
Yes, I do have strong positions about some of those “sensitive” topics, yet my
positions are always subject to revision and questioning by anybody. And, I
accept that if I get proved that my position is flawed or false, that I must
comply to change or discard that position. I have done that and continue doing
that. I have no fear to be proven wrong and acknowledge my ignorance, but for
some people this is a very hard thing to do and/or accept.
The company I work for, is an excellent institution, encouraging and fostering open dialogue and communication. We get trained in how to give and receive feedback, to be open to criticism and to evaluate our wrongful actions to correct our behaviour and make those new behaviours second nature. Although mainly focus on safety and productivity, these skills are easily transferable to others if not all aspects of life. To be open to hear others on how they perceive the things we do, reassess our behaviours and correct them if so the evidence dictates is fundamental.
The company I work for, is an excellent institution, encouraging and fostering open dialogue and communication. We get trained in how to give and receive feedback, to be open to criticism and to evaluate our wrongful actions to correct our behaviour and make those new behaviours second nature. Although mainly focus on safety and productivity, these skills are easily transferable to others if not all aspects of life. To be open to hear others on how they perceive the things we do, reassess our behaviours and correct them if so the evidence dictates is fundamental.
Back to the main
discussion:
In a
conversation during my lunch time, I was prompted by a co-worker on why me
“being such a healthy conscious person – I perceived he was making also allusion to my vegan
lifestyle – would microwave lunch in a plastic container”, I proceeded to ask
him, why should I be concerned? He said, it is bad for me. And, I responded, “that doesn’t tell me anything”. Then, he argued
that there are many chemicals that leaches to the food from the container that
produce (don’t recall if he said “may produce”) cancer and other chronic
illnesses. My initial response to that argument may have been perceived as
defensive, yet I only wanted to let him know that my own health was not the main
driver of my lifestyle, and that I do have a choice on what I take or don’t
take, yet other sentient beings don’t. But, then I accepted my ignorance and
was going to look it up, and the best info I have found so far is from the Cancer Society of Canada and the Harvard Medical School, both with very similar
recommendations. I haven’t decided yet my move forward on this topic, but
shouldn’t take too much longer.
This
conversation then turn to veganism, and as many other conversations I have had,
the typical questions, pseudo-scientific arguments, ending in the avoidance or
that awkward feeling of “why did I open that can of worm, now he won’t stop”,
fortunately I am getting more and more accustom with these reactions. The point
here was that at the end he claimed “ignorance is a bliss” to which I responded
too clearly “bull shit”. Why did I responded with that? Because, he just
question my practice of using plastic containers in the microwave oven, he
attempted to educate me in the topic and now that the ball is in my court he
answer with the answer that I least expected to hear five minutes into the
conversation he started. It makes me think, “was he just testing my character
to find a flaw in my way of reasoning?” Or, the one I think is more likely, as
I would give him the benefit of the doubt, “that he may want to remain ignorant
in this particular topic as would be too uncomfortable to talk about”. In my
eyes, I don’t see the difference, he may have a good point about the plastic
container and I may have a good point as well with regards to animal treatment.
The honest and respectful thing to do is to hear what the other have to say and
make your own honest and unbiased evaluation of our own belief and then change
the behaviour if that is what the re-examination dictates you to do.
On the other
hand, during the last couple of months, I have been working to get people to
attend to the screening of Speciesism: The Movie next Saturday May 3rd
2014 at 2pm at the Red Deer Public Library (downtown). You may wonder, what was
the point to advertise the screening of the documentary here? This event
although open to the public, the main intention is to get friends, co-workers,
and family interested in coming, watch and be open to re-examine their views
and/or behaviour. As I said in third paragraph, people feel that I am trying to
force my views on everybody and that’s how somebody I really care about, after
asking her if she would come to the screening responded “you are not going to
make go vegan!” (or something in those same lines). And, it made me think,
“well, we have had conversations on ‘sensitive’ topics, but I don’t remember
when I coerced her into believing what I say or else”. I have used words and my
own behaviour to show her what I mean and I just wanted her to come and watch
the documentary. I does not mean that I wouldn’t love for everyone to become
vegan, that is not a secret, and if you didn’t know, well now you know. Yet, I
am just asking people to allow themselves to re-examine their views, as Peter
Boghossian said “Certainty is the enemy of the truth: examination and
re-examination are allies of truth”. I accept not to be certain in my view and
hence I allowed everybody to challenge them, no matter what it is, I will
listen and change if their reasoning is compelling enough and the evidence
leaves me no other choice.
To conclude
this, I hope someday all of our defenses come down and honestly accept
challenges, constructive criticism, and feedback as we do with other critical
aspects of life (e.g. safety) and other more superficial ones. And not only
accept, but to re-examine our views with honesty and without prejudices and
change our views and our behaviour if such examination so dictates.
This may not be
a great piece of literature and hope I improve as I practice writing more a
more every Friday. Send me your comments!
Pedro Gonzalez